June 8, 2017
At this point, certain admissions must be made about the purpose
of this blog. In addition to recounting my current expedition, it is an
opportunity to publish in some form my account of the same trip twenty years
ago, which I spent the better part of two years polishing. Much of it ended up
in my novel Paradise Walk, and some of it has turned out to be
too detailed for readers who will want the highlights without being bogged down
by my complaints of sore feet. This still leaves me with putting out a book in
blog form, though. Most descriptions of blogs describe them as shortish
postings, but I think the format has more flexibility than that. So onward I
go!
The new pilgrims,
last seen at Glastonbury, traveled on to Shaftesbury and Salisbury, visiting a
wonderful ruined castle along the way, which I have to mention as an example of
the biggest difference between my trip of twenty years ago and the present
venture. Then, I seldom let a map out of my sight, poring over the Ordnance
Survey maps for footpaths to follow. Now, we mostly navigated by using Google
maps on one of our phones.
The problem with
Google maps is that it instructs you when and which way to turn, but gives you
no information or context of what is beyond the screen. In this way it is
actually like an old-fashioned strip map, which led you along the way from
place to place with the orientation of the map changing constantly as you turn.
(No North up on these maps!) John Ogilby printed 100 of these in his
1675 Britannia Atlas, and I am attaching the one from London
to Portsmouth as an example.
On Sunday, June 4th,
we decided to look at the map for anything we might miss from Google maps, and
found “Wardour Castle” was only a bit out of our way. This was a magnificent
stop for many reasons. The castle was built in the fourteenth century as a “lightly
fortified luxury residence for comfortable living and lavish entertainment,” as
we learned from the brochure. It was blown up in the English Civil War, and in
the eighteenth century became a picturesque ruin on the grounds of the new
stately mansion. It was a lovely day, the rhododendrons were in full bloom and
we spent a few hours rambling around the castle and grounds. I attach a picture
of that too.
Four days later, my
sister Kathy and I remembered our dad on the 103d anniversary of his birth. It
was his death that largely set my first pilgrimage in motion, and I include
below a description of the planning process and the important texts about
pilgrimages in the twentieth century. This passage also describes my original
visit to Winchester with my friend and companion Peg Brandon. Returning in the
present with my new companions, we found ourselves similarly moved by the site
of Jane Austen's grave, and perplexed by the fascinating medieval fraud that is
King Arthur's Round Table. The historical building in which it is located tells
the very interesting story of its creation to make a link between Arthur and
kings who followed centuries later.
The last paragraph of this section introduces Anna, around whom
the second venture was built. I said then that I would like to be “one of those
eccentric great-aunties that lives in a big old rambling Victorian house and
adds a sense of goofiness to the life of this child.” I hope I have
accomplished that.
Note: I am actually retro-writing this from Portland, OR, where I am attending the Historical Novel Writer’s conference with my sister Sheila. At her suggestion, I’m going to start a new, more normal blog when I finish this project!
From the Original Walk: Hilaire
Belloc’s “Old Road”
On my forty-first birthday I was in
England attending the annual meeting of the International Congress of Maritime
Museums, a jolly bunch from around the world who had grown, over fifteen years,
to be my good friends. The next day my
father was having the surgery which would set off a chain of medical crises
from which he would die a month later, and things he said to me in the previous
days and weeks made me think that he knew he would not recover.
It was at that time, and among those
museum friends, that I first began seriously to test the waters about
recreating a pilgrimage. At the time it
was entirely about artifacts, as a way of thinking about where relics fit into
the larger picture, but I had already begun to think about the Wife of Bath as
a framework on which to hang “my sabbatical project.”
When I returned from England I made two
trips in rapid succession to Seattle to be with my father. Arriving home finally to Massachusetts after
his funeral, I found a package in the mail containing a book. David Proctor, whom I knew from long
acquaintance at the National Maritime Museum in Greenwich, had sent me his copy
of Hilaire Belloc’s The Old Road, with instructions to return it to him
when I passed his house in Rochester on my pilgrimage. It was the catalyst that set me on my
way. What had begun as a curiosity about
artifacts, relics, and pilgrimages became entwined with thoughts about my
father and his death and somehow Belloc and his book became part of the fabric
of my plans
Over the next several months I read the
book carefully, ordered the Ordnance Survey maps and began to plan my
trip. It became clear to me very quickly
that I would not retrace Belloc’s path.
The notion of the Wife of Bath was strongly in my mind even before I
read Belloc, and Belloc’s path from Winchester to Canterbury not only missed
the western half of England’s isle, but almost the whole of Chaucer’s route
south from London. Nonetheless, I loved Belloc’s
discussion of roads and pilgrimages and I wanted to follow a portion of the
path described in his book. I decided to
more or less follow Belloc from Winchester as far as the Mole River before
heading north to meet the Thames River near Hampton Court Palace and proceed by
boat from there into London.
Belloc has many interesting theories,
not all of which are convincing, but several of his points became meaningful
for me on my walk. He credits three
factors with preserving the oldest of the paths in England: “the Canterbury
pilgrimage; the establishment of a system of turnpikes in the eighteenth
century; and thirdly, and most important of all, the chalk.” Certainly the walk from Broad Chalke to
Salisbury along the ancient “Herepath” at the top of the chalk ridge made the
third point come home to me. Relics of
pre-history like that path, that follow the landscape of the chalk, and the
newer (but still ancient) “Roman Roads” that run arrow-straight up and down
hills and across streams, never seeking the easy route or the natural ford,
made up both the medieval pilgrimage route and Belloc’s eighteenth century
turnpike. Between Winchester, the shrine
of St. Swithun, and Canterbury, the shrine of St. Thomas Becket, medieval
pilgrims followed the ancient paths.
Belloc said of those pilgrims that the “peculiar association of
antiquity and of religion” along the road “mingles the two ideas almost into
one thing.” It is a notion which which
he clearly associated and which I can understand very well.
From step to step the pilgrims were compelled to take the
oldest of paths. The same force of
antique usage and affection which, in a past beyond all record, had lent their
meaning to rocks and springs upon a public way, re-flourished; and once again,
to the great pleasure of myself who write of it now, and of all my readers who
love to see tradition destroying calculated things, the momentum of generations
overcame.
The pilgrimage saved the road.
Even
before Belloc, nineteenth-century antiquarians in England had been interested
in some sort of a “Pilgrim’s Way” between Winchester and Canterbury, and over
time it had even come to be included on the Ordnance Survey maps. Most historians today think that there never
was a single path deserving the name, but I like Belloc’s concept anyway.
I
was certainly not the first person to contemplate following Belloc’s path since
the publication of his book in 1911.
(And, in fact, Belloc had himself followed the Pilgrim’s Road as
described in an even earlier book by one Mrs. Adie.) From Belloc, there was a progression of books
to be read before starting out, the most recent of which was reviewed in the New
York Times while I was making my preparations. In The Road to Canterbury, Shirley Du
Boulay describes her walk from Winchester to Canterbury with three friends in
1993. Both the purpose and the process
of Du Boulay’s pilgrimage differed from mine, but her observations were often
very insightful, and her book was also in my pack when I set out.
Shirley
Du Boulay undertook her pilgrimage, in part, as part of the process of grieving
for the loss of her husband, and I could sympathize with that, as I was
mourning my father. But she had
converted to Catholicism while I had converted from it. Those things that I still found appealing
from a sentimental and romantic nature were the very things she found most
disquieting. She had, she wrote, been
“too late a convert for relationships with saints and the reverence of relics
and shrines to come naturally.” She did,
though, have a good historical sense of the pilgrimage and was drawn to it
largely by the “thought of those who had walked before.”
In
the absence of Belloc, I don’t think I would have been tempted to follow
Shirley Du Boulay’s path, but her experience being very recent was helpful in
the planning stages. She had a great
logistical advantage over me, however, a friend with a car who met her and her
two walking companions at the end of each day’s walk, took them to their
lodging, and then .deposited them the next morning at the place where they had
left off the day before. Without regular
access to a car, finding a place to stay that was within the compass of my walk
was often the greatest challenge.
A
more practical guide for my pilgrimage was The Pilgrims’ Way from Winchester
to Canterbury by Seán Jennett. Even
though this book is now more than twenty-five years old, it is a remarkably
good guide for the walker. Jennett
traced and retraced Belloc’s paths and alternate paths, and describes options
with realistic detail. At times he
suggests that the smart walker get on a bus for short periods to avoid
travelling on busy roads and by the time I got to Winchester I was ready to
take reasonable advice.
Now in search of Belloc and his path,
Peg and I entered Winchester and found our B&B on St. Cross Street. Having pooped out on half of the walk between
Broughton and Winchester, I was anxious to prove myself again by walking
immediately from the B&B to the cathedral, and after settling our gear we
walked down the hill to the center of town.
By chance we passed by the simple yellow-painted house where Jane Austen
died. Though a private residence, it has
a plaque acknowledging her life and death.
As I read it, I realized that we were on the doorstep of this house 180
years to the day after Jane arrived here, already dying, probably from
Addison’s disease. I secreted one of my
fingernails in a chink in the facade, hoping it would last for a time and link
me to her.
It was just a few steps more to one of
the passages through the wall that surrounds the cathedral. Jane must have walked these very steps when
she was able. We crossed and went
in. The interior of Winchester Cathedral
is vast and remarkably cool. I went
immediately to her grave. There, at the
stone which covers the relics of the author of my favorite novel, I felt the
power of the pilgrimage. While I had
been thinking often of my father along the way, this was a moment to honor my
mother, who introduced me to Jane Austen by giving me Pride and Prejudice
when I was ten. Not long after reading
the book, she and I drove out to Spokane Valley, many miles from where we
lived, to see the Lawrence Olivier and Greer Garson film which was then being
shown in a revival.
At that time I was completely uncritical
about the details that today make most filmed versions of Jane Austen hard for
me to take. I loved Olivier as Darcy,
accepted Greer Garson as Elizabeth Bennet (though it was different watching
Elizabeth be performed, rather than living her life through the book),
and I was appalled that the filmmakers had the audacity to turn Lady Catherine
de Burgh into a character the diametrical opposite of the one created by Jane
Austen. It was a memorable occasion for me. Coming from a large family, having either
parent entirely to myself for a date was a special occasion, and the
combination of loving the book, loving the movie, and feeling a special
relationship with my mom by sharing it with her was wonderful.
In subsequent years as I picked up Pride
and Prejudice again and again, that memory was always there. I have often wondered if I would love the
book so much without that memory, but I am confident that I would. It would have taken a dozen Nancy Drews to
make an Elizabeth Bennet in my world.
She was a character with foibles and a sense of humor that I could
relate to, the first I ever encountered in literature, and I have never met her
equal. Jane Austen’s writing is such a
combination of intelligence, insightful social commentary, and fun that I have
never tired of it. She is
hilarious. I approach my annual reading
of Pride and Prejudice each year with glee, like a visit with a
much-loved friend, and am sorry each and every time that I turn the final page.
Jane’s gravestone is simple and effective. “The benevolence of her heart, the sweetness
of her temper, and the extraordinary endowments of her mind obtained the regard
of all who knew her, and the warmest love of her intimate connections. Their grief is in proportion to their
affection, they know their loss to be irreparable.” Over the years a brass plaque and a stained
glass window have been added, to acknowledge her genius. The stained glass window was disappointing in
every way except the choice of the main text: “In the beginning there was the
Word.” Fitting for Jane Austen
Winchester Cathedral doesn’t have the
elegant simple grandeur of Salisbury, nor the stylistic purity of Wells, but it
is crammed with interesting stuff and I liked it a great deal. The first church on this site, which came to
be known as “Old Minster,” was built in 648.
In 971 the remains of St. Swithun, a local bishop who had died in 862,
were transferred into it. By all
accounts Swithun was a humble man who had requested a humble grave in the
churchyard and the violent mid-summer storm that accompanied the transfer of
his relics into the more opulent resting place was seen as a sign of his
displeasure. The notoriety gained from
the storm, which lasted for forty days, and the miracles that began to occur at
his new tomb created a powerful magnet for pilgrims. St.
Swithun seems best known in England today for the persistent traditional
knowledge that if it rains on St. Swithun’s day, it will rain for the next
forty days. It was my impression that
all English people knew this, but in a random survey of English friends
conducted back in America I found that only three of eight could name the most
important elements, viz. rain and forty days. Two knew it to be “weather related” folklore,
one confused it with Groundhog Day, one with Christ’s wandering in the desert,
and one had never heard of St. Swithun.
Only one could actually name the date of 15 July, with other guesses
occurring in every season of the year, and none could tell me who St. Swithun
was or how he became the groundhog of England.
The movement of Swithun’s relics from
one place to another defined subsequent building projects around Winchester
Cathedral. After the Norman Invasion, a
new and grander church was laid out, and in 1079 construction began so close to
Old Minster that the building of the new church and the demolition of the old
occurred almost simultaneously. (Today
the outline of Old Minster is marked in brick in the churchyard of Winchester
Cathedral.) Major additions were made in
each of the next five centuries, the most dramatic being the total
transformation of the nave between 1350 and 1410, during the period when the
Wife of Bath might have made a pilgrimage here.
In Chaucer’s day it was the greatest rival to Canterbury Cathedral as a
destination for English pilgrims.
In 1476 a grand new shrine was built to
hold the relics of St. Swithun, and for sixty-two years it occupied the central
place in the town of Winchester. In 1538
the shrine and relics were destroyed by a gang of Henry VIII’s thugs from the
Commission for the Destruction of Shrines, and the site in the cathedral stood
empty until 1962. On 15 July (the day of
his stormy transfer), 1100 years after his death, a new commemorative shrine
was built to stand on the site. A plaque
on it reads: “All that could perish of St. Swithun being enshrined within this
place and throughout many ages hallowed by the veneration and honoured by the
gifts of faithful pilgrims from many lands was by a later age destroyed and
none could destroy his glory.” It is
possible to light a candle nearby, which I did.
While St. Swithun was the main
attraction for religious pilgrims, and Jane Austen for literary pilgrims, the
history pilgrim finds a treasure trove here as well. Winchester was the capitol of the Anglo Saxon
kingdom of Wessex, and many of the Anglo Saxon kings and queens, as well as the
Danish invader Canute and his interesting wife Emma, are deposited here. Emma was queen to two kings, the first was
the Anglo Saxon Ethelred the Unready, who had taken his half-brother’s throne
by murder (the unlucky Edward the Martyr, whose grave site I had visited at
Shaftesbury Abbey). Emma’s second
husband was the Viking Canute, whose father booted Ethelred off the throne for
a year or so in 1013. Ethelred managed
to be king again for another couple of years only to have Canute succeed him to
both the crown and his wife (Emma was, consequently, able to keep her crowns,
tiaras, etc., and still wear them to official functions). Canute made a pilgrimage all the way to Rome,
and thereafter always wore a pilgrim’s badge of some sort.
The
bones of Emma and Canute, along with other Anglo Saxon royalty, were placed in
mortuary chests in 1525 and now rest on top of the elaborate screen that
encloses the area beyond the choir, known as the presbytery. Emma’s son with Ethelred was Edward the
Confessor, who was, in 1043, the last English monarch crowned in Winchester
Cathedral. He moved the government to
London and built his own church, Westminster Abbey, where all subsequent
coronations have taken place, and where his grave was a major destination for
pilgrims in Medieval times, as it would be for me in about a one week.
A very
satisfactory visit to the cathedral complete, my companion Peg and I tried to
remember who sang the song “Winchester Cathedral” (my vote was for Hermans
Hermits), and then attempted to sing the song, but could only remember one
chorus and half a verse.
Winchester Cathedral,
you’re bringing me down,
You sat and you watched as
my baby left town.
You could’ve done
something...
[Something about how she
might have stayed] if you’d started ringing your bell.
After a few frustrating stabs at that
we turned to “I’m Henry the Eighth I Am,” a more memorable entry from the
Hermit’s repertoire, and sang it through heartily two or three times until
boredom put an end to our musical tribute to Winchester.
We set off from St. Cross through the
Water Meadows of the Itchen River into town, and proceeded up the hill to the
Great Hall. I knew that there was a
table there, said to be the Round Table of King Arthur, and seeing it was a
high priority. As at Bath, here at
Winchester the three strands of my pilgrimage came together: it was a major
medieval pilgrimage sight for the relics of St. Swithun, it was the place where
Jane Austen had died, and as the ancient capitol of England had held a castle
where William the Conqueror had ruled and spawned the Angevin dynasty with its
deliberate associations with Arthur.
I’m not sure what I was expecting with
this Round Table, but my expectations were surpassed. The Great Hall is built on the site of a
castle that has associations with both King Alfred the Great and William the
Conqueror. Except for this hall,
everything that survived of Winchester castle to the middle of the seventeenth
century was destroyed by order of Oliver Cromwell, who did for castles what
Henry VIII did for monasteries and abbeys.
The Hall itself, like many of England’s great buildings, is mostly
covered in scaffolding, but there is a very interesting excavation of the area
immediately surrounding it and the interior is very dramatic. The Round Table, hanging high up on the wall,
and stretching eighteen feet across is very impressive.
The table dates to about 1300, long
after the setting of Arthur, during that period when his story was being
produced with such gusto. It might have
been made for Edward I for some of his courtly entertainments. He was a fan of Arthurian legend, sponsored
some anachronistic jousts and tournaments and his grandson, Edward III is said
to have founded the Order of the Garter with the Round Table Gang in mind. Henry VIII got his hands on this table many
years later and had it repainted with the names of the legendary knights around
it, a Tudor Rose in the center, and a portrait of Arthur said to look just like
Henry. At one point he actually dragged
some visiting dignitaries, including the Holy Roman Emperor, down to Winchester
to see it. His father, Henry VII, who
had a somewhat tenuous claim to the British throne, named his first son Arthur
and had him christened in Winchester, which was said by some to have been
Arthur’s capitol. I wondered again why
Henry VIII let his gang of dissoluters destroy those tombs in Glastonbury.
The Round Table was a good thing to see
as we departed from Winchester. The
Arthurian connection tied a nice bow to my three subject strands. I was very satisfied as I settled under my
pack and headed north with Peg. The main
street out of Winchester is called Jewry Street, an acknowledgement of the
Jewish population that lived in Winchester until 1290 when King Edward I, that
jolly fan of all things Arthurian, summarily ordered all Jews out of
England. At one time the Jewish Quarter
was situated just inside the city wall of Winchester, and we passed through the
site of the wall’s north gate as we proceeded out of town. Just beyond the wall was Hyde Abbey, built
and rebuilt over the centuries until it, like every other abbey and monastery
in England, was “dissolved” in 1538 by order of Henry VIII.
Thomas Wriothesley, who was in charge
of the abbey’s dissolution, wrote to Henry that he intended to “sweep away all
the rotten bones that be called relics; which we may not omit, lest it be
thought that we came more for the treasure than for the avoiding of the
abomination of idolatry.” Among the
bones so ruthlessly swept away were those of King Alfred the Great, and again I
was astonished at the fervor with which Henry’s gang of thugs attacked not only
Catholicism in the form of saints’ bones, but their own history in the form of
kings’ bones. The relics here included
the head of St. Valentine, given to the abbey by Queen Emma, and a silver cross
given by King Canute.
There is a wonderful and dramatic
statue of Alfred in Winchester. He rests
his left hand on a large round shield, and holds a sword in his right, grasping
it by the blade and elevating it above the height of his head. Alfred made Winchester his capitol in 871 and
it remained the center of British government for four centuries. He died in 899 and was first buried in the
“Old Minster.” He was a student of
Bishop Swithun, and was already interred there when the bones of his teacher,
by then St. Swithun, were moved with such stormy ceremony to a place
nearby.
As the New Minster overtook the Old
Minster, Alfred was moved into the new building, and in 1110 his remains were
transferred to Hyde Abbey. There he lay
in majesty until Thomas Wriothesley decided to rifle through his bones to prove
that he wasn’t just in the business of looting churches for treasure. The land on which the Abbey stood gave way
over the centuries to other buildings, including a prison and a brewery, and
today can be discovered only in the small parish church of Saint
Bartholomew.
About two hundred years ago while
working on the site, a workman uncovered a stone with the inscription: “Aelfred
Rex DCCCLXXXI.” Like the bones it covered, the stone was
swept away by time and unknown strangers, leaving only the story and none of
the evidence. The small guidebook which
you can purchase in St. Bartholomew’s church fairly clearly debunks the
“discovery” of Alfred’s grave as a hoax, and the Church Warden, who spoke to us
at great length, dismissed it even further.
He did take us out back however, where a plain slab, marked only by a
cross, is said by some to be the last resting place of the mortal remains of
the great Saxon King. Belloc, romantic
that he was, chose to believe. “Alfred’s
bones,” he wrote, “seem to have been spared.
It was most probably Alfred’s leaden coffin that was dug up unopened in
the building of the now vanished prison, and sold in 1788. It
fetched two pounds.”
The Pilgrim's Progress
The Pilgrim's Progress
Of all the mountains I scaled between
Bath and Canterbury, there is no doubt but that the climb up to Shaftesbury was
the steepest, and that the climb to St. Martha’ was next in the line-up. I don’t know if it was that I was in better
shape a little more than a week later, or that I was approaching the hill early
in the day, but the ascent to St. Martha’s was very pleasurable, while that to
Shaftesbury was agony. I was comfortable
and confident on this day.
The little forest on the slope of St.
Martha’s hill was dry and piney.
Something about the smell reminded me of the summer camp I went to as a
girl in Spokane, Washington. It was
called “Dart-lo,” a Camp Fire Girl camp on the Spokane River, and the
surrounding forest smelled just like this.
Smells are a very powerful memory device for me, even more powerful than
photographs. Every now and then I get a
whiff of plastic (the last time was when I hung a new shower curtain), and the
smell takes me right back to Christmas circa 1962 and the doll I got that year;
it had the identical aroma. So now I was
trudging up a mountainside south of Guildford, England, with a pack on my back
and a mission to find the bones of saints, and I was thinking about times in
Spokane thirty years before. I never
would have projected myself in the opposite direction. As a little girl in Spokane I would not have
thought that at the age of forty-one I would be walking across England
searching for bones.
It was a hot June day and the grass on
the hilltop was baked from green to brown.
The trees fall back around the little church on the hilltop, so St.
Martha’s was my whole focus as I climbed.
Upon reaching the summit, however, the hill drops away so dramatically
on the other side that the church paled beside the breathtaking landscape to
the south. I pulled out my notebook
again, I had seen something when I was reading the Tennyson that was just right
for here. It is actually a little
snippet from the biography of Tennyson written by his grandson. “The slopes of wold and valley are dotted
with copses and noble trees, amongst which lie tiny villages and square-towered
churches...”
Standing on the hilltop and breathing
in the wide vista below me I saw them all.
I love the words that English poets use to describe their countryside:
wold and copse and weald and vale. I
could see a stream that broadened into a lake where it had been dammed between
two mills. There were several villages
visible, as well as patchwork of farmland, hedges and roads and small groves of
trees. It seemed that I must be standing
on the highest point of land in England.
The beautiful valley that stretched
below me is called “the Vale of the Chilworth,” and in the seventeenth century
it was famous for its gunpowder mills. I
thought of Blake’s “Dark Satanic Mills” and wondered if something like this had
inspired him. (Later that day I was
informed by my hostess in Surrey that Blake did not mean industrial mills but
universities! The song took on a whole
new sinister tone at that point. It was
not a discourse on the loss of the countryside to industrialism but a harangue
in favor of religious inculcation against the incursions of free thought and
speech. Yikes!)
But I am getting ahead of myself. From admiring the Vale of the Chilworth I
proceeded into the little chapel of St. Martha’s, a regular stop on the pilgrim
trail. Just inside the door you can buy
a map of the “Probable Course Near Guildford” of the “Pilgrims Way,
1171-1538.” A talkative guide has a
prepared spiel which he shares with all comers:
“In the corner is a statue carved by a girl of nineteen in the 1940’s which
just shows you what youth can accomplish when they put their minds to it.”
There is little here that survives from
the medieval period, though it has been a spot of some importance for many
centuries. The Norman church that was on
the site was destroyed by the explosion of one of those gunpowder mills just
below it in the valley, and the church that stands here now was mostly built
after the middle of the nineteenth century.
Belloc was much inspired here at the site of St. Martha’s, noting that
it “has been conjectured, upon such slight evidence as archaeology possesses,
that the summit was a place of sacrifice.
Certainly great rings of earth stood here before the beginning of
history.”
Belloc also says that the chapel was
originally dedicated to St. Thomas Becket and that “St. Martha’s” is a
corruption of “Saint/Martyr” or something like that. The guide in the church disagreed, making a
point that this was the only church anywhere dedicated to Martha, a very minor
saint in the pantheon. Seán Jennet says
that the dedication to St. Martha “is rare and is probably a mistake,” and goes
on to say that the name may, in fact, “result from a confusion with ‘Saint
Martyrs’, the hill of martyrs, a name coming from an old tradition that some
six hundred Christians suffered martyrdom on this hill about the year 600.”
There is, at any rate, a stained-glass
window showing St. Thomas Becket, and this has been a place for pilgrims for at
least five hundred years. In the middle
of the fifteenth century the Bishop of Winchester granted a forty-day
indulgence to anyone who made a pilgrimage here and contributed to the church.
Along the route from Gomshall to
Dorking the phone in my pack began to ring, a completely unexpected phenomenon
that had the effect of propelling me, both vertically and horizontally, well
along the path. It was my sister Peggy
calling from Seattle to tell me that our niece Jeannie had given birth to a
baby girl, Anna Apostlefield, the first person of her generation born into our
family. This was not a surprise, of
course, I had known that Anna was on her way for months. I even knew what we would be calling her,
with this wonderfully charming hybrid surname created by my niece and her
husband from a piece of each of their own.
I had purchased a postcard
for the event and now I pulled it out and wrote: “Dear Anna, Welcome. In twenty years you can redeem this card for
a trip to England.” It added promise to
my venture, to think that I would return, years later, in company with this little
as-yet-unknown person, born during my pilgrimage. I think that I shall be one of those
eccentric great-aunties that lives in a big old rambling Victorian house and
adds a sense of goofiness to the life of this child.